Tuesday, 22 July 2014

YOU DECIDE

I was initially going to leave this one alone as its going through the police and lawyers atm, but have since been begged by a number of people to help get the truth out there.


my only opinion is this 
- they certainly used 'their version' along with photos of grace/zoe to get donations and bank details a lot
- they haven't mentioned the fact the true owner is trying to retrieve all animals stolen

the following are screen shots from paws and claws own facebook Aswell as from some of those fighting for zoe and sock's return, majority of the defaming material was removed after police got involved, the parties have copies of these. this is for a rough over view of both sides of the story, from the horses mouth.


THE TRUTH 



the fabrication 


THE GREAT ADVERTISING (well some of the advertising they received from Zoe) 

















some other upset adopters from P&C aswell as their reply to people asking for the truth on Zoe/Grace... or should i say lack of reply








and finally ... 




Friday, 4 July 2014

RIP or???

RIP or???


RIP little fella
taken to a rescue for help
then dumped at the pound to be murdered
you will never be forgotten <3

_____________________________
UPDATE
_____________________________

HES ALIVE!!!!!!!!!! hallelujah! i knew megan was stalking this so thought id use it to my advantage and it worked, the dog megan told the finders she would help, adopt out, she was 'higher' than the average person so she could get him out of the pound (lol no u cant ur not registered)....

HERE HE IS!! she refused to give info about this boy for near a month but after seeing this blog, she posted this photo! im SO HAPPY! I am so grateful shes finally given us the answers we begged for since she dumped him at the pound. the finders even asked and she refused to answer.

you know what sucks? all she had to do was tell us... but instead she enjoyed me feeling guilty i couldnt stop her... she enjoyed holding the power over me that she knew and i didnt.

megan all i wanted to know was if the dog was alive, so THANK YOU from the bottom of my heart for finally telling everyone he is ok. Im going to go visit next week <3 i even know someone who may adopt him EEP so EXCITED! even though you lied, went against your word and messed us around, THANK YOU for saving him in ur own odd way.


PS- this PROVES its BS about 'dog aggression' as AWL does not allow dog aggressive animals be adopted
here he is:
https://animalwelfare.com.au/pets/dog/rhodesian-ridgeback-x-american-staffy/zorro-qe549




YOU decide


so, the following are posts from two rescues, you guys decide what you like but il be posting comments with my opinion.


 

This post from hope for life makes me REALLY uncomfortable.

They state hes in no pain which im very much doubting, but having an open wound covered with what looks like a sawn off water bottle top... thats not hygienic or safe. The edge can easily cut the dog. The tail is raw and should have been amputated as soon as vets said so. Not almost a week after.

i don't understand how money is an issue. The rescue in question along with sister rescue 'crazy kays creations' have accounts, they both are able to pay off vet bills as they have previously. This rescue just had adoptions, with adoption fees of $300- $400 they should have had money to have a down payment.

The above post was removed an hour later, replaced with one stating she will sell her ipad  to cover the cost but donations are welcome but they just cant ask for them. that's great, but this issue had been going on for a while so why wasn't the money being raised. At first conversation when megan was told amputation may be a possibility, money should have been raised. From the day this photo was taken (thursday) the dog will have then waited a minimum of 5 days after to have surgery which may be upcoming this Monday.



this post was uploaded tonight (friday night).  I don't know how RSPCA would feel showing their staff being so un professional and 'laughing' at concerned animal lovers.

I would just like to say it was not me who reported this to RSPCA, in fact i have had nothing to say on the issue until writing this blog. what changed my mind? Kay Boyd from Crazy Kays creation harassing my friend.... they assumed it was me who contacted rspca and wanted payback.

It was not me, but i do agree claiming to be a rescue then pretty much holding an animals surgery to ransom (until someone else paid for it) does need to be assesed by RSPCA. I also believe that if indeed this did reach RSPCA that it be re-assessed as its very inappropriate to laugh at the concerned public.







In conclusion, every rescue comes into contact with these kinds of issues, but the owners sell/make/fundraise. As soon as megan was told amputation may be in the future she should have started factoring it in, the Ipad should have already been sold.  Instead there was a suggestive post made implying the dog would not get the surgery he needed until someone else paid for it. NOT GOOD ENOUGH!

I understand megan believes it was me who reported her to RSPCA, it was not. She does not need me to show her neglect of animals as she does a good job of proving it herself.






SECOND ISSUE:

this was posted the other day and it doesnt sit right with me either.
This is what happens when u own 20ish cats plus 20ish rescues, then allow another person who rescues and HER 15ish (not sure on exact number) cats and couple of dogs.

no doubt this scrap was caused by the stress of all these things combined.

Cinders vet work was all sponsored by a friend of mine, she was a loving, friendly happy cat with no aggression and no tendency to fight. She should have been adopted by now.


My issue with this post is if you are giving adequate care to an animal, how does an issue like this get SO BAD it needs removal? I understand issues with the eye do progress rather quick, but how do you allow the issue to fester? If i see an issue with an animals eye then it goes strait to the vet, i dont 'wait and see'.... Kay is apparently (i say apparently as i have since heard she may not be qualified = i dont know the facts) apparently a vet nurse. Now, somebody claiming to be a rescue and providing high quality care should not allow such an issue to come to this degree. i DO need to commend her on getting her surgery without waiting for someone else to pay -she did step up by the end. This is kays fault and it shouldnt have happened. this also is only one example of a kitty having an eye removed in her recent care.





Im all for people rescuing and helping animals in need, but if you can not provide vet work as soon as its required then STOP taking more in. I believe megans issue was out of laziness, while i suspect kays was as a result of too many animals and not enough care given.

it is not the people 'outing' the bad practices that gives rescue a bad name, no, it is the people FAILING to give appropriate care who are giving rescue a bad name.

Tuesday, 24 June 2014

Le Updates

OKIES!
first things first, the dogs are not the same. which is good, because it means a different dog had its life saved, kudos. But it does not explain what happened to the dog on the left... its hard not to assume it was put to sleep... its sad the only way to get answers is through a blog... lets hope we can find out. As i said, others would have helped if she didnt want to.

ok?? apparently im going to court over a blog. well on the up side, whatever they take me to court for i can counter sue =)

Last but not least, Kerry Mckinnon is now one of my besties! Shes the 38 yro whos oddly obsessed with me.


oh, also, one person who is friends with the above has said she hopes my rescue mission fails... oh darling do u not see... i ended it weeks ago because of the above BULLSHIT! donna's BS with P&C against a small rescue was the straw that broke the camels back, so to speak, it made me realise NO BODY stands up for the under dog.

Rescues a bitch

This is why and how I, Tiffany, got labelled a bitch in rescue.

The following are a list of rescues who have issues with me, along with the REAL reason why they do. Boring uninteresting reasons, unfortunately not the hyped up version most people hear.


Flicks cat rescue and adoption –
I do not know what flicks cat rescue and adoption is like today. My experience comes from a few years ago. While the same people who caused the issues are still in control of flicks I have made an effort to have nothing to do with any of them, I have not enquired, nor do I ever desire to speak to these people again.

Some of you may remember two years ago there was a massive expose on flicks, it was on the news and was a focus of the council and RSPCA. I had been a foster carer for a few months at this point, I was very naïve and followed Felicities word blindly. I backed her up and defended her. This was until I too was burnt by her.

I started looking at the proof for what it was. Those ‘working bee’ days  where we would literally scrub shit off walls and move sick cats to other houses… that was not just because it had to be done, it was because she had a tip off the RSPCA was coming. Flicks right hand woman was working at the RSPCA. The cats were left for days at a time without water and food, locked in dog crates… 5-6 adults to a cage. Donations of science diet and other expensive brands were used for her 8 cats and the sick rescues got home brand food. When ‘shit hit the fan’ and people started standing up against flick she did back down and ‘resign’. 6 months later she was back in charge. There is A LOT more to the Flick saga but I don’t feel it necessary as this is only an overview.

A lot of the other bad workers dispersed into other rescues. Those who stood up against flick were targets of smear campaigns. That is how i got my ‘bad reputation’. I was one of the people to ‘out’ flick as what she really was. Since then I have been threatened with law suits and physical acts of violence. No doubt this will start again once I make this public.

Paws and Claws –

Paws and Claws do a great job with rehoming rates, I encourage people do adopt from all rescues including this one. However I have a personal issue with the way they lie and publicly rally against small independent rescues giving them bad names.

The free cat giveaway saga.

Myself and a few other people had attended a meeting for an organisation to discuss ways to raise money to help people desex their cats. In this closed meeting Paws and Claws Free cat adoptions came up. We discussed the pros and cons of the whole situation. I was upfront in being against it with the monopolisation of the rescue industry, the ‘research’ behind the idea being one small American town, flaws in the process, the secretiveness of the fact these cats along with kittens were free from RSPCA and fully vetted yet ONLY the older ones were free from paws and claws. The list goes on to the discussion we had. No one was planning to take any action on this discussion, it was merely a bunch of animal advocates and rescue workers discussing news in the rescue industry. We even agreed it was great the animals were finding homes, but discussed the negativity that came with it. We also discussed the election and what politicians we could talk to and what things we would fight for. But none of that was brought up again.

One woman named heather took it upon herself to tell Miriam who owns Paws and Claws that Bauhas Mission was planning to ‘bring her down’. I was informed by multiple people about this rumour that was spreading like wildfire. Multiple other people were accused of the same thing. I chose to publically announce this was UNTRUE! While I disagree with the method it was no reason to try to ‘take down’ a rescue. I asked Miriam to make a formal apology as it was unfair I was being accused of something so awful. Instead this turned into a mud slinging match and I was targeted by Miriam’s supporters and friends. I do not lay down to bullies, unfortunately this is my undoing. While other people sucked up to Miriam and friends, I refused to, I refuse to allow someone to stand over me to change my opinion.

Because I stand up for myself and my beliefs I was seen as a target. This is why Paws and Claws hate me.
NEW issue – ‘gracie and her pups’, I was aware of the issue from the start, I did not want to get into it but after the owner of the small rescue begged me to help I shared their plight. Paws and Claws lied to the public, shaming the small rescue on not taking grace and for holding the puppies after they requested they be re-united. The entire situation of this dog and her puppies was a sad one, but it was used and abused by paws and claws, one of their supporters in boxed me telling me they will say and do whatever they have to to get their way… I hate liars, to lie is one of the most low acts you can do. The small rescue was absolutely distraught their name was being smeared by such a large organisation, when they had done nothing wrong.
I did not interject in any of this, I simply shared the small rescues appeal for honesty. This was seen as an attack on the larger organisation and they are not happy = TOO BAD! If you were honest from the start there never would have been an issue.

Conversation between myself and the person pushing paws and claws lies on social media. I inboxed asking for the truth as I was sick of constant lies. Im accused of ‘being up to something’, go figure.
             
Figure 1 reply to me asking whats going on and who did what

 /////Figure 2 confronting her with a screenshot of the truth

 Screen shot of what ACTUALLY happened.



‘donna lindsay’ justifying the lies with the death of an animal





Hope for Life –

I will be upfront and honest, I have never liked Megan who runs this rescue. She was originally a supporter of mine who offered to help foster for me. I got an inbox from a foster carer from another rescue (who I will not name as they are a great rescue) letting me know she had been banned from fostering for them, and tends to give back the animals once the novelty wears off, once the kittens are older, when it all gets too hard. Obviously this was not the reason I disliked her, I just used this information to not use her as a carer.

Fast forward a few months and she asked me to help advertise some semi feral kittens she had, I agreed on the terms she show me the desexing certificate as I would only advertise animals who had been desexed. She refused saying her vet didn’t give out certificates. This made me suspicious and I refused to help her advertise.

A few weeks later she decided to open her own rescue ‘Hope for Life’. It was about this time she won auction items from me, as she lived so far away I dropped the items off at kay Boyd’s house, a mutual acquaintance of ours. It was about this time the two struck up a sort of friendship, kay befriended her because, in her own words, keep friends close and enemies closer.


Not long after the rescue was born I found out she had been using an unlicensed back yard vet from overseas. She had been planning to get this backyard vet to amputate a cats back leg. Myself and Kay put a halt to this and told her to go to Elizabeth park vet as no matter how cheap this back yard vet was it was not ok to risk an animals life like that. Thankfully Elizabeth park agreed to assist her.

The following are dot points on why I grew to not trust Megan. I never had a good feeling about her, I asked kay as well as other rescue workers how they felt and 100% felt something was not right.

  • -        Public call out for foster carers and agreeing to using them with no contract, no house check, no yard check, no knowledge of the person. Getting them to pick up the animal and care for it without knowing anything about them.

  • -        Back yard vet doing LOTS of desexing operations on dogs and cats as well as other surgeries.
  • -        Adopting a puppy out by having a person come to her house, meeting them in the driveway with the dog, handing the dog over and getting the cash. A meet and greet in a driveway is NOT the right way to do things
  • -        Early adoptions, allowing kittens to leave at 6 or so weeks without any vet work being done, in hope the person will bring them back later.
  • -        Not microchipping or vaccinations, its pretty much standard guidelines to make sure a puppy or kitten has its first vaccination, desexed and microchipped before leaving. She now has this as ‘options’. Her excuse of not doing this prior is to keep costs low.

The most recent issue is the young dog Megan took in. A friend of mine (who is more like family) asked me to assist in finding someone to help save a dog, he was emaciated and had an abscess on its ear/cheek from a bite/sore. They knew his chance would not be good at the council because of his state. They offered to pay for his vet work if they could help him. I asked multiple rescues but Megan insisted on helping. I took Kays word that Megan had ‘changed’ and would do the best by him.

Megan took the dog, promising the finder that:
-she had a foster carer ready to go
-she would NOT surrender him to the council but advise them on the found dog, she would look for the owners and if no one stepped forward would desex and rehome like she did with multiple other dogs she had taken in similar circumstances.

That night I was at the vet and saw her and the dog, he was a bouncy playful boy, no training but good temperament. He was playfully barking and megan was sitting on the floor cuddling him and kissing his face. i asked if he was good with dogs, she said he was great with her puppy. I asked if she had a foster carer, she said yes. I then overheard her speaking to her friend that she ‘couldn’t be bothered waiting to take the dog to the foster carer’.

When I got home from the vet I got a phone call from my friend, Megan had surrendered the dog to the council pound. Stating he was severely dog aggressive and she had no choice.

Megan later told me she had every intention of taking him to council in the first place.



My issue is not with taking an animal to council, my issue is not with removing a dangerous dog from society. My issue is that Megan lied. Over the next few days the lies changed and twisted. She could not tell the truth to save her life.

In my opinion on the half hour I spent in the waiting room with the dog he was NOT dog aggressive, he was a playful pup. In my opinion she not only lied to my friend’s family but also to me and the public. While claiming she would not take him to council she later admitted she had every intention on doing so.

Over a week later and my friend cannot get a straight answer from her to what happened to the dog. The council protocol is to have the dog for a maximum of 2 days. It then gets taken to AWL. Aggressive dogs get euthanized on arrival. Megan stated she had phoned the Salisbury council every day. Yet Monday said it was not her who phoned but a lady from Lost Dogs of Adelaide so she would have to ask her what happened to him. Kay informed me she knew people who worked there and as she ‘wasn’t just some member of the public’ she would be able to decide if she wanted him after the hold period was up.

Ironically megan had a dog ‘surrendered’ to her on Monday, near identical to the one my friend found. Great with people and fantastic with dogs. But she swears its not the same dog because the one that was found was ‘aggressive’.

I do not know the truth of what happened and both Megan and Kay refuse to tell anyone any information. From this I have learnt to go with my gut instinct.



Kay Boyd and Crazy Kays Creations –
I do not have any issue with the rescue, she does a wonderful job by the animals.

My issues arose when I phoned kay asking what the **** happened to the dog, as I knew after the vet visit megan would head to kays house. Without meeting the dog Kay supported the choice to surrender him to council for aggressive behaviour. My issue is with the fact she supported Megan’s choice to lie.

I later found out Kay is in fact in debt to Megan, hence her support of Megan in everything she does even down to back yard vets and lying to the public. My main issue lays with the conversation via Facebook after where kay laid the blame on my friend and her family, accusing them of neglecting the animal… even though they sought help and offered financial assistance. It is apparent she is so caught up with protecting a friendship that honesty is being neglected.

I decided to cease my friendship with Kay as a result of this. Under no circumstance should someone claiming to be an advocate for animals EVER put a human’s ego before that of an animal. I lost respect when she backed up a lie and blamed the people who asked for help.


Bettys place – Elizabeth / Kerry Mckinnon

Now, this ‘rescue’ is quite small and unheard of. This woman was a supporter of my mission and I quite enjoyed the updates of ‘bettys place’. This was until I realised that the 14-20 cats, 3 dogs, chickens, birds ect were not up for adoption or fosters but her pets. Now, that’s wonderful, good on her for rescuing these babies and giving them a home. My issue came with glossing over the fact they were her pets, while soliciting monetary donations as well as asking for help with vaccinations, desexings, food and litter.
I have NO issue with someone needing help, my issue lies in the fact this woman gets money from every which way, people think they are helping animals looking for homes when they aren’t. Kerry did NOT like the fact I pointed this out, OOOOH NO! instead she took to her facebook page (seems to be a trend here) saying im a trouble making little cow… all for asking her to tell the truth?
               

causing trouble with other rescues
 pointing out my PRIVATE health issues...lovely


                                                                                  fooling people into donating money

  

Since then this woman regularly sends abusive messages and reports my mission as well as personal facebook. At 38 she seems quite obsessed with me. She claims a massive police report is filed against me, in the same paragraph as saying she is going to start more rumours about me… class.
Now I add this woman to the list as she thrives on drama, she loves it! Its like oxygen to her. As a result she has made close friends with people like Megan, bonding over hatred of people who tell the truth. Kerry has a history of actively causing trouble in the rescue community (shown above).


CONCLUSION

So why have I put this all in writing? Because im sick and tired of being told ‘I heard you’re a trouble maker’ or ‘you have a bad reputation’. If YOU hear this, send this to the person who made the comment. Do they actually know WHY I have a bad reputation? It’s easy in this day and age for rumours to start, facebook allows gutless people to be keyboard warriors. I will never be sorry for standing up for what I believe in, I will never be sorry for not allowing people to walk all over me. I was not put on this earth to allow others to manipulate me.

Take this for example…



This is what I got the other day, because I lost my shit over Megan lying and putting a dog at risk. Suzanne is pissed off as im ‘making small rescues look bad and people lose faith’. Well you know what? Rescue is bad, rescue is bitchy, like every industry in this world there are assholes. People are sick of my ‘naming and shaming’, I have an easy solution:

STOP lying, STOP spreading rumours and do it FOR THE ANIMALS!

Rescue doesn’t HAVE to be full of bitches, but because they constantly get away with being assholes without anyone standing up to them they continue it. Its easy to say ‘you better not, it doesn’t look good’ but sometimes it takes someone who doesn’t give a shit about their ‘look’ and instead cares more about integrity to make a change.

With the opinion im bitchy and always running people down, WHY am I doing this? 1 - because I see injustice or 2 – an animal’s life is at risk. Yes It would be easier to do what most people do (bitch behind peoples backs and spread rumours so it doesn’t look bad on them), but that’s not right is it?

I was taught lying was the worst a person can do without physical harm. It truly baffles me to see people lie with such ease, who are comfortable with causing havoc for the hell of it.

I have no issue with being hated for what I have done, I stand by what I have done, but DO NOT lie about what I have done. That’s why I have written this, if you hate me for the above, go ahead. I’m fine with that as I’m comfortable with my actions. But accuse me of something I didn’t do and I will call you out on it.
Something about me that is good to know, I don’t care what others think of me, I don’t care about opinions on what I do. I just HATE lies and I HATE people saying ‘I stand up for injustice’ when all they do is hide the truth so It looks all rosey to the public and wider community.


So I hope this clears up some rumors about who I am and what I stand for, I am strong headed and passionate. I will speak for the voiceless and the under dog and I will not stand by and watch someone lie to look better or cover their ass.